Fix issue with peer stream node cleanup.
This commit encompasses a few problems that are closely related due to their
proximity in the code.
1. The peerstream utilizes node IDs in several locations to determine which
nodes / services / checks should be cleaned up or created. While VM deployments
with agents will likely always have a node ID, agentless uses synthetic nodes
and does not populate the field. This means that for consul-k8s deployments, all
services were likely bundled together into the same synthetic node in some code
paths (but not all), resulting in strange behavior. The Node.Node field should
be used instead as a unique identifier, as it should always be populated.
2. The peerstream cleanup process for unused nodes uses an incorrect query for
node deregistration. This query is NOT namespace aware and results in the node
(and corresponding services) being deregistered prematurely whenever it has zero
default-namespace services and 1+ non-default-namespace services registered on
it. This issue is tricky to find due to the incorrect logic mentioned in #1,
combined with the fact that the affected services must be co-located on the same
node as the currently deregistering service for this to be encountered.
3. The stream tracker did not understand differences between services in
different namespaces and could therefore report incorrect numbers. It was
updated to utilize the full service name to avoid conflicts and return proper
results.
Ensure that the peer stream replication rpc can successfully be used with TLS activated.
Also:
- If key material is configured for the gRPC port but HTTPS is not
enabled now TLS will still be activated for the gRPC port.
- peerstream replication stream opened by the establishing-side will now
ignore grpc.WithBlock so that TLS errors will bubble up instead of
being awkwardly delayed or suppressed
Previously, public referred to gRPC services that are both exposed on
the dedicated gRPC port and have their definitions in the proto-public
directory (so were considered usable by 3rd parties). Whereas private
referred to services on the multiplexed server port that are only usable
by agents and other servers.
Now, we're splitting these definitions, such that external/internal
refers to the port and public/private refers to whether they can be used
by 3rd parties.
This is necessary because the peering replication API needs to be
exposed on the dedicated port, but is not (yet) suitable for use by 3rd
parties.
Derek Menteer