4 Commits (500dcb1f214639441db41b53a8eb617fa34aac4a)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Michael Wilkerson	0dd4ea2033	* added Sameness Group to proto files (#16998) ... - added Sameness Group to config entries - added Sameness Group to subscriptions * generated proto files * added Sameness Group events to the state store - added test cases * Refactored health RPC Client - moved code that is common to rpcclient under rpcclient common.go. This will help set us up to support future RPC clients * Refactored proxycfg glue views - Moved views to rpcclient config entry. This will allow us to reuse this code for a config entry client * added config entry RPC Client - Copied most of the testing code from rpcclient/health * hooked up new rpcclient in agent * fixed documentation and comments for clarity	2 years ago
Ronald	94ec4eb2f4	copyright headers for agent folder (#16704) ... * copyright headers for agent folder * Ignore test data files * fix proto files and remove headers in agent/uiserver folder * ignore deep-copy files	2 years ago
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) ... Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago
Daniel Upton	3c533ceea8	proxycfg-glue: server-local implementation of `ServiceList` ... This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2242. This PR introduces a server-local implementation of the proxycfg.ServiceList interface, backed by streaming events and a local materializer.	2 years ago