consul

Tree: 38dd704984

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302 ) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago
Matt Keeler	8b4eb0c8c1	Fix usage of protoc-gen-go-binary (#15920 ) * Fix usage of protoc-gen-go-binary * Pin protoc-gen-go-binary version	2 years ago
boruszak	38b1a515f1	Mergimg	2 years ago
Dan Upton	b9e525d689	grpc: rename public/private directories to external/internal (#13721 ) Previously, public referred to gRPC services that are both exposed on the dedicated gRPC port and have their definitions in the proto-public directory (so were considered usable by 3rd parties). Whereas private referred to services on the multiplexed server port that are only usable by agents and other servers. Now, we're splitting these definitions, such that external/internal refers to the port and public/private refers to whether they can be used by 3rd parties. This is necessary because the peering replication API needs to be exposed on the dedicated port, but is not (yet) suitable for use by 3rd parties.	2 years ago
Dan Upton	7298967070	Restructure gRPC server setup (#12586 ) OSS sync of enterprise changes at 0b44395e	3 years ago
Daniel Nephin	fd42804063	grpc: Add a simple test service for testing the gRPC server	4 years ago
Matt Keeler	2713c0e682	Refactor the agentpb package (#8362 ) First move the whole thing to the top-level proto package name. Secondly change some things around internally to have sub-packages.	4 years ago
Matt Keeler	9b01f9423c	Implement the insecure version of the Cluster.AutoConfig RPC endpoint Right now this is only hooked into the insecure RPC server and requires JWT authorization. If no JWT authorizer is setup in the configuration then we inject a disabled “authorizer” to always report that JWT authorization is disabled.	4 years ago

3 Commits (38dd704984afc13407c9a7cde445310b17f01445)