- added Sameness Group to config entries
- added Sameness Group to subscriptions
* generated proto files
* added Sameness Group events to the state store
- added test cases
* Refactored health RPC Client
- moved code that is common to rpcclient under rpcclient common.go. This will help set us up to support future RPC clients
* Refactored proxycfg glue views
- Moved views to rpcclient config entry. This will allow us to reuse this code for a config entry client
* added config entry RPC Client
- Copied most of the testing code from rpcclient/health
* hooked up new rpcclient in agent
* fixed documentation and comments for clarity
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness
This commit includes the following:
Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private
Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved
Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces
Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml
Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes)
Why:
In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage.
There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations.
The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch)
Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem
Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root.
This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry.
The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory.
That then required rewriting all the imports.
Is this safe?
AFAICT yes
The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc)
Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2249.
This PR introduces an implementation of the proxycfg.Health interface based on a
local materialized view of the health events.
It reuses the view and request machinery from agent/rpcclient/health, which made
it super straightforward.
This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2056.
This commit provides server-local implementations of the proxycfg.ConfigEntry
and proxycfg.ConfigEntryList interfaces, that source data from streaming events.
It makes use of the LocalMaterializer type introduced for peering replication,
adding the necessary support for authorization.
It also adds support for "wildcard" subscriptions (within a topic) to the event
publisher, as this is needed to fetch service-resolvers for all services when
configuring mesh gateways.
Currently, events will be emitted for just the ingress-gateway, service-resolver,
and mesh config entry types, as these are the only entries required by proxycfg
— the events will be emitted on topics named IngressGateway, ServiceResolver,
and MeshConfig topics respectively.
Though these events will only be consumed "locally" for now, they can also be
consumed via the gRPC endpoint (confirmed using grpcurl) so using them from
client agents should be a case of swapping the LocalMaterializer for an
RPCMaterializer.
The primary bug here is in the streaming subsystem that makes the overall v1/health/service/:service request behave incorrectly when servicing a blocking request with a filter provided.
There is a secondary non-streaming bug being fixed here that is much less obvious related to when to update the `reply` variable in a `blockingQuery` evaluation. It is unlikely that it is triggerable in practical environments and I could not actually get the bug to manifest, but I fixed it anyway while investigating the original issue.
Simple reproduction (streaming):
1. Register a service with a tag.
curl -sL --request PUT 'http://localhost:8500/v1/agent/service/register' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{ "ID": "ID1", "Name": "test", "Tags":[ "a" ], "EnableTagOverride": true }'
2. Do an initial filter query that matches on the tag.
curl -sLi --get 'http://localhost:8500/v1/health/service/test' --data-urlencode 'filter=a in Service.Tags'
3. Note you get one result. Use the `X-Consul-Index` header to establish
a blocking query in another terminal, this should not return yet.
curl -sLi --get 'http://localhost:8500/v1/health/service/test?index=$INDEX' --data-urlencode 'filter=a in Service.Tags'
4. Re-register that service with a different tag.
curl -sL --request PUT 'http://localhost:8500/v1/agent/service/register' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{ "ID": "ID1", "Name": "test", "Tags":[ "b" ], "EnableTagOverride": true }'
5. Your blocking query from (3) should return with a header
`X-Consul-Query-Backend: streaming` and empty results if it works
correctly `[]`.
Attempts to reproduce with non-streaming failed (where you add `&near=_agent` to the read queries and ensure `X-Consul-Query-Backend: blocking-query` shows up in the results).
Michael Wilkerson