consul

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
hashicorp-copywrite[bot]	5fb9df1640	[COMPLIANCE] License changes (#18443 ) * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository. * Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at <Blog URL>, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl. * add missing license headers * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 * Update copyright file headers to BUSL-1.1 --------- Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>	1 year ago
Dan Stough	2793761702	[OSS] Improve xDS Code Coverage - Clusters (#18165 ) test: improve xDS cluster code coverage	1 year ago
Dan Stough	33d898b857	[OSS] test: improve xDS listener code coverage (#18138 ) test: improve xDS listener code coverage	1 year ago
Ronald	94ec4eb2f4	copyright headers for agent folder (#16704 ) * copyright headers for agent folder * Ignore test data files * fix proto files and remove headers in agent/uiserver folder * ignore deep-copy files	2 years ago
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302 ) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago
Derek Menteer	418bd62c44	Fix mesh gateway configuration with proxy-defaults (#15186 ) * Fix mesh gateway proxy-defaults not affecting upstreams. * Clarify distinction with upstream settings Top-level mesh gateway mode in proxy-defaults and service-defaults gets merged into NodeService.Proxy.MeshGateway, and only gets merged with the mode attached to an an upstream in proxycfg/xds. * Fix mgw mode usage for peered upstreams There were a couple issues with how mgw mode was being handled for peered upstreams. For starters, mesh gateway mode from proxy-defaults and the top-level of service-defaults gets stored in NodeService.Proxy.MeshGateway, but the upstream watch for peered data was only considering the mesh gateway config attached in NodeService.Proxy.Upstreams[i]. This means that applying a mesh gateway mode via global proxy-defaults or service-defaults on the downstream would not have an effect. Separately, transparent proxy watches for peered upstreams didn't consider mesh gateway mode at all. This commit addresses the first issue by ensuring that we overlay the upstream config for peered upstreams as we do for non-peered. The second issue is addressed by re-using setupWatchesForPeeredUpstream when handling transparent proxy updates. Note that for transparent proxies we do not yet support mesh gateway mode per upstream, so the NodeService.Proxy.MeshGateway mode is used. * Fix upstream mesh gateway mode handling in xds This commit ensures that when determining the mesh gateway mode for peered upstreams we consider the NodeService.Proxy.MeshGateway config as a baseline. In absense of this change, setting a mesh gateway mode via proxy-defaults or the top-level of service-defaults will not have an effect for peered upstreams. * Merge service/proxy defaults in cfg resolver Previously the mesh gateway mode for connect proxies would be merged at three points: 1. On servers, in ComputeResolvedServiceConfig. 2. On clients, in MergeServiceConfig. 3. On clients, in proxycfg/xds. The first merge returns a ServiceConfigResponse where there is a top-level MeshGateway config from proxy/service-defaults, along with per-upstream config. The second merge combines per-upstream config specified at the service instance with per-upstream config specified centrally. The third merge combines the NodeService.Proxy.MeshGateway config containing proxy/service-defaults data with the per-upstream mode. This third merge is easy to miss, which led to peered upstreams not considering the mesh gateway mode from proxy-defaults. This commit removes the third merge, and ensures that all mesh gateway config is available at the upstream. This way proxycfg/xds do not need to do additional overlays. * Ensure that proxy-defaults is considered in wc Upstream defaults become a synthetic Upstream definition under a wildcard key "". Now that proxycfg/xds expect Upstream definitions to have the final MeshGateway values, this commit ensures that values from proxy-defaults/service-defaults are the default for this synthetic upstream. Add changelog. Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>	2 years ago
Eric Haberkorn	6570d5f004	Enable outbound peered requests to go through local mesh gateway (#14763 )	2 years ago
Chris S. Kim	495936300e	Make envoy resources for inferred peered upstreams (#13758 ) Peered upstreams has a separate loop in xds from discovery chain upstreams. This PR adds similar but slightly modified code to add filters for peered upstream listeners, clusters, and endpoints in the case of transparent proxy.	2 years ago
R.B. Boyer	f557509e58	xds: allow for peered upstreams to use tagged addresses that are hostnames (#13422 ) Mesh gateways can use hostnames in their tagged addresses (#7999). This is useful if you were to expose a mesh gateway using a cloud networking load balancer appliance that gives you a DNS name but no reliable static IPs. Envoy cannot accept hostnames via EDS and those must be configured using CDS. There was already logic when configuring gateways in other locations in the code, but given the illusions in play for peering the downstream of a peered service wasn't aware that it should be doing that. Also: - ensuring that we always try to use wan-like addresses to cross peer boundaries.	2 years ago
R.B. Boyer	019aeaa57d	peering: update how cross-peer upstreams and represented in proxycfg and rendered in xds (#13362 ) This removes unnecessary, vestigal remnants of discovery chains.	3 years ago
Freddy	74ca6406ea	Configure upstream TLS context with peer root certs (#13321 ) For mTLS to work between two proxies in peered clusters with different root CAs, proxies need to configure their outbound listener to use different root certificates for validation. Up until peering was introduced proxies would only ever use one set of root certificates to validate all mesh traffic, both inbound and outbound. Now an upstream proxy may have a leaf certificate signed by a CA that's different from the dialing proxy's. This PR makes changes to proxycfg and xds so that the upstream TLS validation uses different root certificates depending on which cluster is being dialed.	3 years ago
freddygv	364758ef2f	Use embedded SpiffeID for peered upstreams	3 years ago

12 Commits (backend-changes-doesnt-run-frontend-task-on-ci-test)