6 Commits (GH-migration-add-oss-ent-builder-logic)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Matt Keeler	085c0addc0	Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) ... Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.	2 years ago
Daniel Upton	653b8c4f9d	proxycfg: server-local config entry data sources ... This is the OSS portion of enterprise PR 2056. This commit provides server-local implementations of the proxycfg.ConfigEntry and proxycfg.ConfigEntryList interfaces, that source data from streaming events. It makes use of the LocalMaterializer type introduced for peering replication, adding the necessary support for authorization. It also adds support for "wildcard" subscriptions (within a topic) to the event publisher, as this is needed to fetch service-resolvers for all services when configuring mesh gateways. Currently, events will be emitted for just the ingress-gateway, service-resolver, and mesh config entry types, as these are the only entries required by proxycfg — the events will be emitted on topics named IngressGateway, ServiceResolver, and MeshConfig topics respectively. Though these events will only be consumed "locally" for now, they can also be consumed via the gRPC endpoint (confirmed using grpcurl) so using them from client agents should be a case of swapping the LocalMaterializer for an RPCMaterializer.	2 years ago
Eric	776f5843d0	remove gogo from pbservice	3 years ago
Dhia Ayachi	72a997242b	split `pbcommon` to `pbcommon` and `pbcommongogo` (#12587) ... * mogify needed pbcommon structs * mogify needed pbconnect structs * fix compilation errors and make config_translate_test pass * add missing file * remove redundant oss func declaration * fix EnterpriseMeta to copy the right data for enterprise * rename pbcommon package to pbcommongogo * regenerate proto and mog files * add missing mog files * add pbcommon package * pbcommon no mog * fix enterprise meta code generation * fix enterprise meta code generation (pbcommongogo) * fix mog generation for gogo * use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags * rename proto package * pbcommon no mog * use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags * add non gogo proto to make file * fix proto get	3 years ago
Daniel Nephin	c932833acb	rpcclient:health: fix a data race and flake in tests ... Split the TestStreamingClient into the two logical components the real client uses. This allows us to test multiple clients properly. Previously writing of ctx from multiple Subscribe calls was showing a data race. Once this was fixed a test started to fail because the request had to be made with a greater index, so that the store.Get call did not return immediately.	4 years ago
Daniel Nephin	c574108354	submatview: setup testing structure	4 years ago