consul

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
freddygv	f3843809da	Avoid deleting peerings marked as terminated. When our peer deletes the peering it is locally marked as terminated. This termination should kick off deleting all imported data, but should not delete the peering object itself. Keeping peerings marked as terminated acts as a signal that the action took place.	2 years ago
freddygv	6453375ab2	Add leader routine to clean up peerings Once a peering is marked for deletion a new leader routine will now clean up all imported resources and then the peering itself. A lot of the logic was grabbed from the namespace/partitions deferred deletions but with a handful of simplifications: - The rate limiting is not configurable. - Deleting imported nodes/services/checks is done by deleting nodes with the Txn API. The services and checks are deleted as a side-effect. - There is no "round rate limiter" like with namespaces and partitions. This is because peerings are purely local, and deleting a peering in the datacenter does not depend on deleting data from other DCs like with WAN-federated namespaces. All rate limiting is handled by the Raft rate limiter.	2 years ago
freddygv	cc921a9c78	Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of data at once could overload Consul. Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that: 1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field. 2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources before deleting the peering itself. This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the deferred deletion leader routine.	2 years ago
R.B. Boyer	7001e1151c	peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419 )	2 years ago
R.B. Boyer	a85b8a4705	api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204 ) I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them. I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. Other changes: - the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl` - some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi ) - peeringRead returns `nil` if not found - partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)	3 years ago
FFMMM	b8ce8e36fb	add err msg on PeeringRead not found (#12986 ) Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>	3 years ago
FFMMM	37a1e33834	expose meta tags for peering (#12964 )	3 years ago
FFMMM	745bd15b15	api: add PeeeringList, polish (#12934 )	3 years ago
FFMMM	3b3f001580	[sync oss] api: add peering api module (#12911 )	3 years ago
R.B. Boyer	f507f62f3c	peering: initial sync (#12842 ) - Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering - Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers - Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer - Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679, ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663, ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634, ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555 Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>	3 years ago

10 Commits (CSLC-91-egress-connect-proxy)