You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
consul/agent/structs/acl_legacy.go

187 lines
4.9 KiB

New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
6 years ago
// DEPRECATED (ACL-Legacy-Compat)
//
// Everything within this file is deprecated and related to the original ACL
// implementation. Once support for v1 ACLs are removed this whole file can
// be deleted.
package structs
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"time"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
)
const (
// ACLBootstrapInit is used to perform a scan for existing tokens which
// will decide whether bootstrapping is allowed for a cluster. This is
// initiated by the leader when it steps up, if necessary.
ACLBootstrapInit ACLOp = "bootstrap-init"
// ACLBootstrapNow is used to perform a one-time ACL bootstrap operation on
// a cluster to get the first management token.
ACLBootstrapNow ACLOp = "bootstrap-now"
// ACLForceSet is deprecated, but left for backwards compatibility.
ACLForceSet ACLOp = "force-set"
)
// ACLBootstrapNotInitializedErr is returned when a bootstrap is attempted but
// we haven't yet initialized ACL bootstrap. It provides some guidance to
// operators on how to proceed.
var ACLBootstrapNotInitializedErr = errors.New("ACL bootstrap not initialized, need to force a leader election and ensure all Consul servers support this feature")
const (
// ACLTokenTypeClient tokens have rules applied
ACLTokenTypeClient = "client"
// ACLTokenTypeManagement tokens have an always allow policy, so they can
// make other tokens and can access all resources.
ACLTokenTypeManagement = "management"
// ACLTokenTypeNone
ACLTokenTypeNone = ""
)
// ACL is used to represent a token and its rules
type ACL struct {
ID string
Name string
Type string
Rules string
RaftIndex
}
// ACLs is a slice of ACLs.
type ACLs []*ACL
// Convert does a 1-1 mapping of the ACLCompat structure to its ACLToken
// equivalent. This will NOT fill in the other ACLToken fields or perform any other
// upgrade (other than correcting an older HCL syntax that is no longer
// supported).
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
6 years ago
func (a *ACL) Convert() *ACLToken {
// Ensure that we correct any old HCL in legacy tokens to prevent old
// syntax from leaking elsewhere into the system.
//
// DEPRECATED (ACL-Legacy-Compat)
correctedRules := SanitizeLegacyACLTokenRules(a.Rules)
if correctedRules != "" {
a.Rules = correctedRules
}
token := &ACLToken{
AccessorID: "",
SecretID: a.ID,
Description: a.Name,
Policies: nil,
ServiceIdentities: nil,
NodeIdentities: nil,
Type: a.Type,
Rules: a.Rules,
Local: false,
RaftIndex: a.RaftIndex,
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
6 years ago
}
token.SetHash(true)
return token
New ACLs (#4791) This PR is almost a complete rewrite of the ACL system within Consul. It brings the features more in line with other HashiCorp products. Obviously there is quite a bit left to do here but most of it is related docs, testing and finishing the last few commands in the CLI. I will update the PR description and check off the todos as I finish them over the next few days/week. Description At a high level this PR is mainly to split ACL tokens from Policies and to split the concepts of Authorization from Identities. A lot of this PR is mostly just to support CRUD operations on ACLTokens and ACLPolicies. These in and of themselves are not particularly interesting. The bigger conceptual changes are in how tokens get resolved, how backwards compatibility is handled and the separation of policy from identity which could lead the way to allowing for alternative identity providers. On the surface and with a new cluster the ACL system will look very similar to that of Nomads. Both have tokens and policies. Both have local tokens. The ACL management APIs for both are very similar. I even ripped off Nomad's ACL bootstrap resetting procedure. There are a few key differences though. Nomad requires token and policy replication where Consul only requires policy replication with token replication being opt-in. In Consul local tokens only work with token replication being enabled though. All policies in Nomad are globally applicable. In Consul all policies are stored and replicated globally but can be scoped to a subset of the datacenters. This allows for more granular access management. Unlike Nomad, Consul has legacy baggage in the form of the original ACL system. The ramifications of this are: A server running the new system must still support other clients using the legacy system. A client running the new system must be able to use the legacy RPCs when the servers in its datacenter are running the legacy system. The primary ACL DC's servers running in legacy mode needs to be a gate that keeps everything else in the entire multi-DC cluster running in legacy mode. So not only does this PR implement the new ACL system but has a legacy mode built in for when the cluster isn't ready for new ACLs. Also detecting that new ACLs can be used is automatic and requires no configuration on the part of administrators. This process is detailed more in the "Transitioning from Legacy to New ACL Mode" section below.
6 years ago
}
// Convert attempts to convert an ACLToken into an ACLCompat.
func (tok *ACLToken) Convert() (*ACL, error) {
if tok.Type == "" {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Cannot convert ACLToken into compat token")
}
compat := &ACL{
ID: tok.SecretID,
Name: tok.Description,
Type: tok.Type,
Rules: tok.Rules,
RaftIndex: tok.RaftIndex,
}
return compat, nil
}
// IsSame checks if one ACL is the same as another, without looking
// at the Raft information (that's why we didn't call it IsEqual). This is
// useful for seeing if an update would be idempotent for all the functional
// parts of the structure.
func (a *ACL) IsSame(other *ACL) bool {
if a.ID != other.ID ||
a.Name != other.Name ||
a.Type != other.Type ||
a.Rules != other.Rules {
return false
}
return true
}
// ACLRequest is used to create, update or delete an ACL
type ACLRequest struct {
Datacenter string
Op ACLOp
ACL ACL
WriteRequest
}
func (r *ACLRequest) RequestDatacenter() string {
return r.Datacenter
}
// ACLRequests is a list of ACL change requests.
type ACLRequests []*ACLRequest
// ACLSpecificRequest is used to request an ACL by ID
type ACLSpecificRequest struct {
Datacenter string
ACL string
QueryOptions
}
// RequestDatacenter returns the DC this request is targeted to.
func (r *ACLSpecificRequest) RequestDatacenter() string {
return r.Datacenter
}
// IndexedACLs has tokens along with the Raft metadata about them.
type IndexedACLs struct {
ACLs ACLs
QueryMeta
}
// ACLBootstrap keeps track of whether bootstrapping ACLs is allowed for a
// cluster.
type ACLBootstrap struct {
// AllowBootstrap will only be true if no existing management tokens
// have been found.
AllowBootstrap bool
RaftIndex
}
// ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest is used to request an ACL by Token SecretID, conditionally
// filtering on an ID
type ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest struct {
Datacenter string // The Datacenter the RPC may be sent to
ACL string // The Tokens Secret ID
ETag string // Caching ETag to prevent resending the policy when not needed
QueryOptions
}
// RequestDatacenter returns the DC this request is targeted to.
func (r *ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest) RequestDatacenter() string {
return r.Datacenter
}
type ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse struct {
ETag string
Parent string
Policy *acl.Policy
TTL time.Duration
QueryMeta
}