Consul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

70 lines
1.8 KiB

GOTOOLS = \
github.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfs/... \
github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata/... \
github.com/mitchellh/gox \
golang.org/x/tools/cmd/cover \
golang.org/x/tools/cmd/stringer
TEST ?= ./...
GOTAGS ?= consul
GOFILES ?= $(shell go list $(TEST) | grep -v /vendor/)
# all builds binaries for all targets
all: bin
bin: tools
@mkdir -p bin/
@GOTAGS='$(GOTAGS)' sh -c "'$(CURDIR)/scripts/build.sh'"
9 years ago
# dev creates binaries for testing locally - these are put into ./bin and $GOPATH
dev: format
@CONSUL_DEV=1 GOTAGS='$(GOTAGS)' sh -c "'$(CURDIR)/scripts/build.sh'"
# dist builds binaries for all platforms and packages them for distribution
dist:
@GOTAGS='$(GOTAGS)' sh -c "'$(CURDIR)/scripts/dist.sh'"
cov:
gocov test ${GOFILES} | gocov-html > /tmp/coverage.html
open /tmp/coverage.html
test:
@./scripts/verify_no_uuid.sh
@env \
GOTAGS="${GOTAGS}" \
GOFILES="${GOFILES}" \
TESTARGS="${TESTARGS}" \
sh -c "'$(CURDIR)/scripts/test.sh'"
cover:
go test ${GOFILES} --cover
format:
@echo "--> Running go fmt"
@go fmt ${GOFILES}
Makefile: add vet target Add a vet target in order to catch suspicious constructs reported by go vet. Vet has successfully detected problems in the past, for example, see c9333b1b9b472feb5cad80e2c8276d41b64bde88 Some vet flags are noisy. In particular, the following flags reports a large amount of generally unharmful constructs: ``` -assign: check for useless assignments -composites: check that composite literals used field-keyed elements -shadow: check for shadowed variables -shadowstrict: whether to be strict about shadowing -unreachable: check for unreachable code ``` In order to skip running the flags mentioned above, vet is invoked on a directory basis with `go tool vet .` since package- level type-checking with `go vet` doesn't accept flags. Hence, each file is vetted in isolation, which is weaker than package-level type-checking. But nevertheless, it might catch suspicious constructs that pose a real issue. The vet target runs the following flags on the entire repo: ``` -asmdecl: check assembly against Go declarations -atomic: check for common mistaken usages of the sync/atomic package -bool: check for mistakes involving boolean operators -buildtags: check that +build tags are valid -copylocks: check that locks are not passed by value -methods: check that canonically named methods are canonically defined -nilfunc: check for comparisons between functions and nil -printf: check printf-like invocations -rangeloops: check that range loop variables are used correctly -shift: check for useless shifts -structtags: check that struct field tags have canonical format and apply to exported fields as needed -unsafeptr: check for misuse of unsafe.Pointer ``` Now and then, it might make sense to check the output of the disabled flags manually. For example, `VETARGS=-unreachable make vet` can detect several lines of dead code that can be deleted, etc.
10 years ago
vet:
@echo "--> Running go vet"
@go vet ${GOFILES}; if [ $$? -eq 1 ]; then \
Makefile: add vet target Add a vet target in order to catch suspicious constructs reported by go vet. Vet has successfully detected problems in the past, for example, see c9333b1b9b472feb5cad80e2c8276d41b64bde88 Some vet flags are noisy. In particular, the following flags reports a large amount of generally unharmful constructs: ``` -assign: check for useless assignments -composites: check that composite literals used field-keyed elements -shadow: check for shadowed variables -shadowstrict: whether to be strict about shadowing -unreachable: check for unreachable code ``` In order to skip running the flags mentioned above, vet is invoked on a directory basis with `go tool vet .` since package- level type-checking with `go vet` doesn't accept flags. Hence, each file is vetted in isolation, which is weaker than package-level type-checking. But nevertheless, it might catch suspicious constructs that pose a real issue. The vet target runs the following flags on the entire repo: ``` -asmdecl: check assembly against Go declarations -atomic: check for common mistaken usages of the sync/atomic package -bool: check for mistakes involving boolean operators -buildtags: check that +build tags are valid -copylocks: check that locks are not passed by value -methods: check that canonically named methods are canonically defined -nilfunc: check for comparisons between functions and nil -printf: check printf-like invocations -rangeloops: check that range loop variables are used correctly -shift: check for useless shifts -structtags: check that struct field tags have canonical format and apply to exported fields as needed -unsafeptr: check for misuse of unsafe.Pointer ``` Now and then, it might make sense to check the output of the disabled flags manually. For example, `VETARGS=-unreachable make vet` can detect several lines of dead code that can be deleted, etc.
10 years ago
echo ""; \
echo "Vet found suspicious constructs. Please check the reported constructs"; \
echo "and fix them if necessary before submitting the code for review."; \
exit 1; \
Makefile: add vet target Add a vet target in order to catch suspicious constructs reported by go vet. Vet has successfully detected problems in the past, for example, see c9333b1b9b472feb5cad80e2c8276d41b64bde88 Some vet flags are noisy. In particular, the following flags reports a large amount of generally unharmful constructs: ``` -assign: check for useless assignments -composites: check that composite literals used field-keyed elements -shadow: check for shadowed variables -shadowstrict: whether to be strict about shadowing -unreachable: check for unreachable code ``` In order to skip running the flags mentioned above, vet is invoked on a directory basis with `go tool vet .` since package- level type-checking with `go vet` doesn't accept flags. Hence, each file is vetted in isolation, which is weaker than package-level type-checking. But nevertheless, it might catch suspicious constructs that pose a real issue. The vet target runs the following flags on the entire repo: ``` -asmdecl: check assembly against Go declarations -atomic: check for common mistaken usages of the sync/atomic package -bool: check for mistakes involving boolean operators -buildtags: check that +build tags are valid -copylocks: check that locks are not passed by value -methods: check that canonically named methods are canonically defined -nilfunc: check for comparisons between functions and nil -printf: check printf-like invocations -rangeloops: check that range loop variables are used correctly -shift: check for useless shifts -structtags: check that struct field tags have canonical format and apply to exported fields as needed -unsafeptr: check for misuse of unsafe.Pointer ``` Now and then, it might make sense to check the output of the disabled flags manually. For example, `VETARGS=-unreachable make vet` can detect several lines of dead code that can be deleted, etc.
10 years ago
fi
# build the static web ui and build static assets inside a Docker container, the
# same way a release build works
ui:
@sh -c "'$(CURDIR)/scripts/ui.sh'"
# generates the static web ui that's compiled into the binary
static-assets:
@echo "--> Generating static assets"
@go-bindata-assetfs -pkg agent -prefix pkg ./pkg/web_ui/...
@mv bindata_assetfs.go command/agent
$(MAKE) format
tools:
go get -u -v $(GOTOOLS)
.PHONY: all ci bin dev dist cov test cover format vet ui static-assets tools