You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
consul/proto-public/pbconnectca/ca.pb.go

561 lines
21 KiB

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
// versions:
[Cloud][CC-6925] Updates to pushing server state (#19682) * Upgrade hcp-sdk-go to latest version v0.73 Changes: - go get github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go - go mod tidy * From upgrade: regenerate protobufs for upgrade from 1.30 to 1.31 Ran: `make proto` Slack: https://hashicorp.slack.com/archives/C0253EQ5B40/p1701105418579429 * From upgrade: fix mock interface implementation After upgrading, there is the following compile error: cannot use &mockHCPCfg{} (value of type *mockHCPCfg) as "github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go/config".HCPConfig value in return statement: *mockHCPCfg does not implement "github.com/hashicorp/hcp-sdk-go/config".HCPConfig (missing method Logout) Solution: update the mock to have the missing Logout method * From upgrade: Lint: remove usage of deprecated req.ServerState.TLS Due to upgrade, linting is erroring due to usage of a newly deprecated field 22:47:56 [consul]: make lint --> Running golangci-lint (.) agent/hcp/testing.go:157:24: SA1019: req.ServerState.TLS is deprecated: use server_tls.internal_rpc instead. (staticcheck) time.Until(time.Time(req.ServerState.TLS.CertExpiry)).Hours()/24, ^ * From upgrade: adjust oidc error message From the upgrade, this test started failing: === FAIL: internal/go-sso/oidcauth TestOIDC_ClaimsFromAuthCode/failed_code_exchange (re-run 2) (0.01s) oidc_test.go:393: unexpected error: Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: "invalid_grant" "unexpected auth code" Prior to the upgrade, the error returned was: ``` Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: cannot fetch token: 401 Unauthorized\nResponse: {\"error\":\"invalid_grant\",\"error_description\":\"unexpected auth code\"}\n ``` Now the error returned is as below and does not contain "cannot fetch token" ``` Provider login failed: Error exchanging oidc code: oauth2: "invalid_grant" "unexpected auth code" ``` * Update AgentPushServerState structs with new fields HCP-side changes for the new fields are in: https://github.com/hashicorp/cloud-global-network-manager-service/pull/1195/files * Minor refactor for hcpServerStatus to abstract tlsInfo into struct This will make it easier to set the same tls-info information to both - status.TLS (deprecated field) - status.ServerTLSMetadata (new field to use instead) * Update hcpServerStatus to parse out information for new fields Changes: - Improve error message and handling (encountered some issues and was confused) - Set new field TLSInfo.CertIssuer - Collect certificate authority metadata and set on TLSInfo.CertificateAuthorities - Set TLSInfo on both server.TLS and server.ServerTLSMetadata.InternalRPC * Update serverStatusToHCP to convert new fields to GNM rpc * Add changelog * Feedback: connect.ParseCert, caCerts * Feedback: refactor and unit test server status * Feedback: test to use expected struct * Feedback: certificate with intermediate * Feedback: catch no leaf, remove expectedErr * Feedback: update todos with jira ticket * Feedback: mock tlsConfigurator
12 months ago
// protoc-gen-go v1.31.0
// protoc (unknown)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
// source: pbconnectca/ca.proto
package pbconnectca
import (
2 years ago
_ "github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto-public/annotations/ratelimit"
protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
timestamppb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/timestamppb"
reflect "reflect"
sync "sync"
)
const (
// Verify that this generated code is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(20 - protoimpl.MinVersion)
// Verify that runtime/protoimpl is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(protoimpl.MaxVersion - 20)
)
type WatchRootsRequest struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
}
func (x *WatchRootsRequest) Reset() {
*x = WatchRootsRequest{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[0]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *WatchRootsRequest) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*WatchRootsRequest) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *WatchRootsRequest) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[0]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use WatchRootsRequest.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*WatchRootsRequest) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
}
type WatchRootsResponse struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// active_root_id is the ID of a root in Roots that is the active CA root.
// Other roots are still valid if they're in the Roots list but are in the
// process of being rotated out.
ActiveRootId string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=active_root_id,json=activeRootId,proto3" json:"active_root_id,omitempty"`
// trust_domain is the identification root for this Consul cluster. All
// certificates signed by the cluster's CA must have their identifying URI
// in this domain.
//
// This does not include the protocol (currently spiffe://) since we may
// implement other protocols in future with equivalent semantics. It should
// be compared against the "authority" section of a URI (i.e. host:port).
TrustDomain string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=trust_domain,json=trustDomain,proto3" json:"trust_domain,omitempty"`
// roots is a list of root CA certs to trust.
Roots []*CARoot `protobuf:"bytes,3,rep,name=roots,proto3" json:"roots,omitempty"`
}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) Reset() {
*x = WatchRootsResponse{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[1]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*WatchRootsResponse) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[1]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use WatchRootsResponse.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*WatchRootsResponse) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{1}
}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) GetActiveRootId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.ActiveRootId
}
return ""
}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) GetTrustDomain() string {
if x != nil {
return x.TrustDomain
}
return ""
}
func (x *WatchRootsResponse) GetRoots() []*CARoot {
if x != nil {
return x.Roots
}
return nil
}
type CARoot struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// id is a globally unique ID (UUID) representing this CA root.
Id string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=id,proto3" json:"id,omitempty"`
// name is a human-friendly name for this CA root. This value is opaque to
// Consul and is not used for anything internally.
Name string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=name,proto3" json:"name,omitempty"`
// serial_number is the x509 serial number of the certificate.
SerialNumber uint64 `protobuf:"varint,3,opt,name=serial_number,json=serialNumber,proto3" json:"serial_number,omitempty"`
// signing_key_id is the connect.HexString encoded id of the public key that
// corresponds to the private key used to sign leaf certificates in the
// local datacenter.
//
// The value comes from x509.Certificate.SubjectKeyId of the local leaf
// signing cert.
//
// See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3280#section-4.2.1.1 for more detail.
SigningKeyId string `protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=signing_key_id,json=signingKeyId,proto3" json:"signing_key_id,omitempty"`
// root_cert is the PEM-encoded public certificate.
RootCert string `protobuf:"bytes,5,opt,name=root_cert,json=rootCert,proto3" json:"root_cert,omitempty"`
// intermediate_certs is a list of PEM-encoded intermediate certs to
// attach to any leaf certs signed by this CA.
IntermediateCerts []string `protobuf:"bytes,6,rep,name=intermediate_certs,json=intermediateCerts,proto3" json:"intermediate_certs,omitempty"`
// active is true if this is the current active CA. This must only
// be true for exactly one CA.
Active bool `protobuf:"varint,7,opt,name=active,proto3" json:"active,omitempty"`
// rotated_out_at is the time at which this CA was removed from the state.
// This will only be set on roots that have been rotated out from being the
// active root.
RotatedOutAt *timestamppb.Timestamp `protobuf:"bytes,8,opt,name=rotated_out_at,json=rotatedOutAt,proto3" json:"rotated_out_at,omitempty"`
}
func (x *CARoot) Reset() {
*x = CARoot{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[2]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *CARoot) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*CARoot) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *CARoot) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[2]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use CARoot.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*CARoot) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{2}
}
func (x *CARoot) GetId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Id
}
return ""
}
func (x *CARoot) GetName() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Name
}
return ""
}
func (x *CARoot) GetSerialNumber() uint64 {
if x != nil {
return x.SerialNumber
}
return 0
}
func (x *CARoot) GetSigningKeyId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.SigningKeyId
}
return ""
}
func (x *CARoot) GetRootCert() string {
if x != nil {
return x.RootCert
}
return ""
}
func (x *CARoot) GetIntermediateCerts() []string {
if x != nil {
return x.IntermediateCerts
}
return nil
}
func (x *CARoot) GetActive() bool {
if x != nil {
return x.Active
}
return false
}
func (x *CARoot) GetRotatedOutAt() *timestamppb.Timestamp {
if x != nil {
return x.RotatedOutAt
}
return nil
}
type SignRequest struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// csr is the PEM-encoded Certificate Signing Request (CSR).
//
// The CSR's SAN must include a SPIFFE ID that identifies a service or agent
// to which the ACL token provided in the `x-consul-token` metadata has write
// access.
Csr string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=csr,proto3" json:"csr,omitempty"`
}
func (x *SignRequest) Reset() {
*x = SignRequest{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[3]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *SignRequest) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*SignRequest) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *SignRequest) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[3]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use SignRequest.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*SignRequest) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{3}
}
func (x *SignRequest) GetCsr() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Csr
}
return ""
}
type SignResponse struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// cert_pem is the PEM-encoded leaf certificate.
CertPem string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=cert_pem,json=certPem,proto3" json:"cert_pem,omitempty"`
}
func (x *SignResponse) Reset() {
*x = SignResponse{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[4]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *SignResponse) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*SignResponse) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *SignResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[4]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use SignResponse.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*SignResponse) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{4}
}
func (x *SignResponse) GetCertPem() string {
if x != nil {
return x.CertPem
}
return ""
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var File_pbconnectca_ca_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
var file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
0x0a, 0x14, 0x70, 0x62, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x61,
0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x12, 0x1a, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74,
0x63, 0x61, 0x1a, 0x25, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x2f,
0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69,
0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x1a, 0x1f, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c,
0x65, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75, 0x66, 0x2f, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x73,
0x74, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x22, 0x13, 0x0a, 0x11, 0x57, 0x61,
0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x22,
0x97, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x12, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x52, 0x65,
0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x12, 0x24, 0x0a, 0x0e, 0x61, 0x63, 0x74, 0x69, 0x76, 0x65,
0x5f, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x69, 0x64, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0c,
0x61, 0x63, 0x74, 0x69, 0x76, 0x65, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x49, 0x64, 0x12, 0x21, 0x0a, 0x0c,
0x74, 0x72, 0x75, 0x73, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x64, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x61, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01,
0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0b, 0x74, 0x72, 0x75, 0x73, 0x74, 0x44, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x61, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x12,
0x38, 0x0a, 0x05, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x22,
0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x41, 0x52, 0x6f,
0x6f, 0x74, 0x52, 0x05, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x22, 0x9d, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x43, 0x41,
0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x12, 0x0e, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x69, 0x64, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09,
0x52, 0x02, 0x69, 0x64, 0x12, 0x12, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01,
0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x04, 0x6e, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x12, 0x23, 0x0a, 0x0d, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x69,
0x61, 0x6c, 0x5f, 0x6e, 0x75, 0x6d, 0x62, 0x65, 0x72, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x04, 0x52,
0x0c, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x69, 0x61, 0x6c, 0x4e, 0x75, 0x6d, 0x62, 0x65, 0x72, 0x12, 0x24, 0x0a,
0x0e, 0x73, 0x69, 0x67, 0x6e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x67, 0x5f, 0x6b, 0x65, 0x79, 0x5f, 0x69, 0x64, 0x18,
0x04, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x0c, 0x73, 0x69, 0x67, 0x6e, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x67, 0x4b, 0x65,
0x79, 0x49, 0x64, 0x12, 0x1b, 0x0a, 0x09, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x63, 0x65, 0x72, 0x74,
0x18, 0x05, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x08, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x43, 0x65, 0x72, 0x74,
0x12, 0x2d, 0x0a, 0x12, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x64, 0x69, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65,
0x5f, 0x63, 0x65, 0x72, 0x74, 0x73, 0x18, 0x06, 0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x11, 0x69, 0x6e,
0x74, 0x65, 0x72, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x64, 0x69, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x43, 0x65, 0x72, 0x74, 0x73, 0x12,
0x16, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x61, 0x63, 0x74, 0x69, 0x76, 0x65, 0x18, 0x07, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x08, 0x52,
0x06, 0x61, 0x63, 0x74, 0x69, 0x76, 0x65, 0x12, 0x40, 0x0a, 0x0e, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x61, 0x74,
0x65, 0x64, 0x5f, 0x6f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x61, 0x74, 0x18, 0x08, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32,
0x1a, 0x2e, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x75,
0x66, 0x2e, 0x54, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x61, 0x6d, 0x70, 0x52, 0x0c, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74,
0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x64, 0x4f, 0x75, 0x74, 0x41, 0x74, 0x22, 0x1f, 0x0a, 0x0b, 0x53, 0x69, 0x67,
0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x63, 0x73, 0x72, 0x18,
0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x03, 0x63, 0x73, 0x72, 0x22, 0x29, 0x0a, 0x0c, 0x53, 0x69,
0x67, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x12, 0x19, 0x0a, 0x08, 0x63, 0x65,
0x72, 0x74, 0x5f, 0x70, 0x65, 0x6d, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x07, 0x63, 0x65,
0x72, 0x74, 0x50, 0x65, 0x6d, 0x32, 0xf0, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x10, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63,
0x74, 0x43, 0x41, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65, 0x12, 0x77, 0x0a, 0x0a, 0x57, 0x61,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x12, 0x2d, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
2 years ago
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x2e, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73,
0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65,
0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x2e, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x52, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x73, 0x52,
0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x22, 0x08, 0xe2, 0x86, 0x04, 0x04, 0x08, 0x02, 0x10,
0x03, 0x30, 0x01, 0x12, 0x63, 0x0a, 0x04, 0x53, 0x69, 0x67, 0x6e, 0x12, 0x27, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61,
0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x69, 0x67, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71,
0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x28, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63,
0x61, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x69, 0x67, 0x6e, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x22, 0x08,
0xe2, 0x86, 0x04, 0x04, 0x08, 0x03, 0x10, 0x03, 0x42, 0xe9, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x1e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d,
0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75,
0x6c, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x42, 0x07, 0x43, 0x61, 0x50,
0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x50, 0x01, 0x5a, 0x34, 0x67, 0x69, 0x74, 0x68, 0x75, 0x62, 0x2e, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2f, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e,
0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x2d, 0x70, 0x75, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x63,
0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0xa2, 0x02, 0x03, 0x48,
0x43, 0x43, 0xaa, 0x02, 0x1a, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x43,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0xca,
0x02, 0x1a, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73,
0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0xe2, 0x02, 0x26, 0x48,
0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c,
0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x5c, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74,
0x61, 0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0xea, 0x02, 0x1c, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x6e, 0x65,
0x63, 0x74, 0x63, 0x61, 0x62, 0x06, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x33,
}
var (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescData = file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDesc
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
func file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescData)
})
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDescData
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 5)
var file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
(*WatchRootsRequest)(nil), // 0: hashicorp.consul.connectca.WatchRootsRequest
(*WatchRootsResponse)(nil), // 1: hashicorp.consul.connectca.WatchRootsResponse
(*CARoot)(nil), // 2: hashicorp.consul.connectca.CARoot
(*SignRequest)(nil), // 3: hashicorp.consul.connectca.SignRequest
(*SignResponse)(nil), // 4: hashicorp.consul.connectca.SignResponse
(*timestamppb.Timestamp)(nil), // 5: google.protobuf.Timestamp
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
2, // 0: hashicorp.consul.connectca.WatchRootsResponse.roots:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.connectca.CARoot
5, // 1: hashicorp.consul.connectca.CARoot.rotated_out_at:type_name -> google.protobuf.Timestamp
0, // 2: hashicorp.consul.connectca.ConnectCAService.WatchRoots:input_type -> hashicorp.consul.connectca.WatchRootsRequest
3, // 3: hashicorp.consul.connectca.ConnectCAService.Sign:input_type -> hashicorp.consul.connectca.SignRequest
1, // 4: hashicorp.consul.connectca.ConnectCAService.WatchRoots:output_type -> hashicorp.consul.connectca.WatchRootsResponse
4, // 5: hashicorp.consul.connectca.ConnectCAService.Sign:output_type -> hashicorp.consul.connectca.SignResponse
4, // [4:6] is the sub-list for method output_type
2, // [2:4] is the sub-list for method input_type
2, // [2:2] is the sub-list for extension type_name
2, // [2:2] is the sub-list for extension extendee
0, // [0:2] is the sub-list for field type_name
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
func init() { file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_init() }
func file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_init() {
if File_pbconnectca_ca_proto != nil {
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*WatchRootsRequest); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[1].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*WatchRootsResponse); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[2].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*CARoot); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[3].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*SignRequest); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes[4].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*SignResponse); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
}
type x struct{}
out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
RawDescriptor: file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDesc,
NumEnums: 0,
NumMessages: 5,
NumExtensions: 0,
NumServices: 1,
},
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
GoTypes: file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_goTypes,
DependencyIndexes: file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_depIdxs,
MessageInfos: file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_msgTypes,
}.Build()
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
File_pbconnectca_ca_proto = out.File
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_rawDesc = nil
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_goTypes = nil
file_pbconnectca_ca_proto_depIdxs = nil
}