consul/agent/connect/ca/mock_Provider.go

273 lines
5.9 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
// Code generated by mockery v2.20.0. DO NOT EDIT.
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
package ca
import (
x509 "crypto/x509"
mock "github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
// MockProvider is an autogenerated mock type for the Provider type
type MockProvider struct {
mock.Mock
}
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
// ActiveLeafSigningCert provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) ActiveLeafSigningCert() (string, error) {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() (string, error)); ok {
return rf()
}
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// Cleanup provides a mock function with given fields: providerTypeChange, otherConfig
func (_m *MockProvider) Cleanup(providerTypeChange bool, otherConfig map[string]interface{}) error {
ret := _m.Called(providerTypeChange, otherConfig)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(bool, map[string]interface{}) error); ok {
r0 = rf(providerTypeChange, otherConfig)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// Configure provides a mock function with given fields: cfg
func (_m *MockProvider) Configure(cfg ProviderConfig) error {
ret := _m.Called(cfg)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(ProviderConfig) error); ok {
r0 = rf(cfg)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// CrossSignCA provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) CrossSignCA(_a0 *x509.Certificate) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.Certificate) (string, error)); ok {
return rf(_a0)
}
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.Certificate) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.Certificate) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// GenerateIntermediateCSR provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) GenerateIntermediateCSR() (string, string, error) {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 string
var r2 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() (string, string, error)); ok {
return rf()
}
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() string); ok {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Get(1).(string)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(2).(func() error); ok {
r2 = rf()
} else {
r2 = ret.Error(2)
}
return r0, r1, r2
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
// GenerateCAChain provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) GenerateCAChain() (CAChainResult, error) {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
ret := _m.Called()
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r0 CAChainResult
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() (CAChainResult, error)); ok {
return rf()
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() CAChainResult); ok {
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
r0 = rf()
} else {
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
r0 = ret.Get(0).(CAChainResult)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
}
// SetIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields: intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque
func (_m *MockProvider) SetIntermediate(intermediatePEM string, rootPEM string, opaque string) error {
ret := _m.Called(intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
var r0 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(string, string, string) error); ok {
r0 = rf(intermediatePEM, rootPEM, opaque)
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
} else {
r0 = ret.Error(0)
}
return r0
}
// Sign provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) Sign(_a0 *x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error)); ok {
return rf(_a0)
}
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// SignIntermediate provides a mock function with given fields: _a0
func (_m *MockProvider) SignIntermediate(_a0 *x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error) {
ret := _m.Called(_a0)
var r0 string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) (string, error)); ok {
return rf(_a0)
}
CA Provider Plugins (#4751) This adds the `agent/connect/ca/plugin` library for consuming/serving Connect CA providers as [go-plugin](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-plugin) plugins. This **does not** wire this up in any way to Consul itself, so this will not enable using these plugins yet. ## Why? We want to enable CA providers to be pluggable without modifying Consul so that any CA or PKI system can potentially back the Connect certificates. This CA system may also be used in the future for easier bootstrapping and internal cluster security. ### go-plugin The benefit of `go-plugin` is that for the plugin consumer, the fact that the interface implementation is communicating over multi-process RPC is invisible. Internals of Consul will continue to just use `ca.Provider` interface implementations as if they're local. For plugin _authors_, they simply have to implement the interface. The network/transport/process management issues are handled by go-plugin itself. The CA provider plugins support both `net/rpc` and gRPC transports. This enables easy authoring in any language. go-plugin handles the actual protocol handshake and connection. This is just a feature of go-plugin. `go-plugin` is already in production use for years by Packer, Terraform, Nomad, Vault, and Sentinel. We've shown stability for both desktop and server-side software. It is very mature. ## Implementation Details ### `map[string]interface{}` The `Configure` method passes a `map[string]interface{}`. This map contains only Go primitives and containers of primitives (no funcs, chans, etc.). For `net/rpc` we encode as-is using Gob. For gRPC we marshal to JSON and transmit as a `bytes` type. This is the same approach we take with Vault and other software. Note that this is just the transport protocol, the end software views it fully decoded. ### `x509.Certificate` and `CertificateRequest` We transmit the raw ASN.1 bytes and decode on the other side. Unit tests are verifying we get the same cert/csrs across the wire. ### Testing `go-plugin` exposes test helpers that enable testing the full plugin RPC over real loopback network connections. We test all endpoints for success and error for both `net/rpc` and gRPC. ### Vendoring This PR doesn't introduce vendoring for two reasons: 1. @banks's `f-envoy` branch introduces a lot of these and I didn't want conflict. 2. The library isn't actually used yet so it doesn't introduce compile-time errors (it does introduce test errors). ## Next Steps With this in place, we need to figure out the proper way to actually hook these up to Consul, load them, etc. This discussion can happen elsewhere, since regardless of approach this plugin library implementation is the exact same.
2019-01-07 17:48:44 +00:00
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) string); ok {
r0 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(string)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func(*x509.CertificateRequest) error); ok {
r1 = rf(_a0)
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// State provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) State() (map[string]string, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 map[string]string
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() (map[string]string, error)); ok {
return rf()
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() map[string]string); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
if ret.Get(0) != nil {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(map[string]string)
}
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
// SupportsCrossSigning provides a mock function with given fields:
func (_m *MockProvider) SupportsCrossSigning() (bool, error) {
ret := _m.Called()
var r0 bool
Connect CA Primary Provider refactor (#16749) * Rename Intermediate cert references to LeafSigningCert Within the Consul CA subsystem, the term "Intermediate" is confusing because the meaning changes depending on provider and datacenter (primary vs secondary). For example, when using the Consul CA the "ActiveIntermediate" may return the root certificate in a primary datacenter. At a high level, we are interested in knowing which CA is responsible for signing leaf certs, regardless of its position in a certificate chain. This rename makes the intent clearer. * Move provider state check earlier * Remove calls to GenerateLeafSigningCert GenerateLeafSigningCert (formerly known as GenerateIntermediate) is vestigial in non-Vault providers, as it simply returns the root certificate in primary datacenters. By folding Vault's intermediate cert logic into `GenerateRoot` we can encapsulate the intermediate cert handling within `newCARoot`. * Move GenerateLeafSigningCert out of PrimaryProvidder Now that the Vault Provider calls GenerateLeafSigningCert within GenerateRoot, we can remove the method from all other providers that never used it in a meaningful way. * Add test for IntermediatePEM * Rename GenerateRoot to GenerateCAChain "Root" was being overloaded in the Consul CA context, as different providers and configs resulted in a single root certificate or a chain originating from an external trusted CA. Since the Vault provider also generates intermediates, it seems more accurate to call this a CAChain.
2023-04-03 15:40:33 +00:00
var r1 error
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() (bool, error)); ok {
return rf()
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(0).(func() bool); ok {
r0 = rf()
} else {
r0 = ret.Get(0).(bool)
}
if rf, ok := ret.Get(1).(func() error); ok {
r1 = rf()
} else {
r1 = ret.Error(1)
}
return r0, r1
}
type mockConstructorTestingTNewMockProvider interface {
mock.TestingT
Cleanup(func())
}
// NewMockProvider creates a new instance of MockProvider. It also registers a testing interface on the mock and a cleanup function to assert the mocks expectations.
func NewMockProvider(t mockConstructorTestingTNewMockProvider) *MockProvider {
mock := &MockProvider{}
mock.Mock.Test(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { mock.AssertExpectations(t) })
return mock
}