You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
consul/proto-public/pbserverdiscovery/serverdiscovery.pb.go

339 lines
14 KiB

// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
// Package serverdiscovery provides a service on Consul servers to discover the set of servers
// currently able to handle incoming requests.
// Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT.
// versions:
// protoc-gen-go v1.30.0
// protoc (unknown)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
// source: pbserverdiscovery/serverdiscovery.proto
package pbserverdiscovery
import (
2 years ago
_ "github.com/hashicorp/consul/proto-public/annotations/ratelimit"
protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
reflect "reflect"
sync "sync"
)
const (
// Verify that this generated code is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(20 - protoimpl.MinVersion)
// Verify that runtime/protoimpl is sufficiently up-to-date.
_ = protoimpl.EnforceVersion(protoimpl.MaxVersion - 20)
)
type WatchServersRequest struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// Wan being set to true will cause WAN addresses to be sent in the response
// instead of the LAN addresses which are the default
Wan bool `protobuf:"varint,1,opt,name=wan,proto3" json:"wan,omitempty"`
}
func (x *WatchServersRequest) Reset() {
*x = WatchServersRequest{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[0]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *WatchServersRequest) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*WatchServersRequest) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *WatchServersRequest) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[0]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use WatchServersRequest.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*WatchServersRequest) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{0}
}
func (x *WatchServersRequest) GetWan() bool {
if x != nil {
return x.Wan
}
return false
}
type WatchServersResponse struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// Servers is the list of server address information.
Servers []*Server `protobuf:"bytes,1,rep,name=servers,proto3" json:"servers,omitempty"`
}
func (x *WatchServersResponse) Reset() {
*x = WatchServersResponse{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[1]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *WatchServersResponse) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*WatchServersResponse) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *WatchServersResponse) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[1]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use WatchServersResponse.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*WatchServersResponse) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{1}
}
func (x *WatchServersResponse) GetServers() []*Server {
if x != nil {
return x.Servers
}
return nil
}
type Server struct {
state protoimpl.MessageState
sizeCache protoimpl.SizeCache
unknownFields protoimpl.UnknownFields
// id is the unique string identifying this server for all time.
Id string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=id,proto3" json:"id,omitempty"`
// address on the network of the server
Address string `protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=address,proto3" json:"address,omitempty"`
// the consul version of the server
Version string `protobuf:"bytes,3,opt,name=version,proto3" json:"version,omitempty"`
}
func (x *Server) Reset() {
*x = Server{}
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[2]
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
}
func (x *Server) String() string {
return protoimpl.X.MessageStringOf(x)
}
func (*Server) ProtoMessage() {}
func (x *Server) ProtoReflect() protoreflect.Message {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
mi := &file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[2]
if protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled && x != nil {
ms := protoimpl.X.MessageStateOf(protoimpl.Pointer(x))
if ms.LoadMessageInfo() == nil {
ms.StoreMessageInfo(mi)
}
return ms
}
return mi.MessageOf(x)
}
// Deprecated: Use Server.ProtoReflect.Descriptor instead.
func (*Server) Descriptor() ([]byte, []int) {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescGZIP(), []int{2}
}
func (x *Server) GetId() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Id
}
return ""
}
func (x *Server) GetAddress() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Address
}
return ""
}
func (x *Server) GetVersion() string {
if x != nil {
return x.Version
}
return ""
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var File_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto protoreflect.FileDescriptor
var file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDesc = []byte{
0x0a, 0x27, 0x70, 0x62, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76,
0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2f, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76,
0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x12, 0x20, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76,
0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x1a, 0x25, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x6e,
0x6f, 0x74, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d,
0x69, 0x74, 0x2f, 0x72, 0x61, 0x74, 0x65, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x6d, 0x69, 0x74, 0x2e, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f,
0x74, 0x6f, 0x22, 0x27, 0x0a, 0x13, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65,
0x72, 0x73, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x12, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x77, 0x61, 0x6e,
0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x08, 0x52, 0x03, 0x77, 0x61, 0x6e, 0x22, 0x5a, 0x0a, 0x14, 0x57,
0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x73, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x12, 0x42, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x73, 0x18, 0x01,
0x20, 0x03, 0x28, 0x0b, 0x32, 0x28, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69,
0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x52, 0x07,
0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x73, 0x22, 0x4c, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65,
0x72, 0x12, 0x0e, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x69, 0x64, 0x18, 0x01, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x02, 0x69,
0x64, 0x12, 0x18, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x61, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x18, 0x02, 0x20, 0x01,
0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x07, 0x61, 0x64, 0x64, 0x72, 0x65, 0x73, 0x73, 0x12, 0x18, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x76,
0x65, 0x72, 0x73, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x18, 0x03, 0x20, 0x01, 0x28, 0x09, 0x52, 0x07, 0x76, 0x65,
0x72, 0x73, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x32, 0xa4, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x16, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
0x44, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x69, 0x63, 0x65,
0x12, 0x89, 0x01, 0x0a, 0x0c, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
0x73, 0x12, 0x35, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2e, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63, 0x68, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
0x73, 0x52, 0x65, 0x71, 0x75, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74, 0x1a, 0x36, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76,
0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x2e, 0x57, 0x61, 0x74, 0x63,
0x68, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x73, 0x52, 0x65, 0x73, 0x70, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x65,
0x22, 0x08, 0xe2, 0x86, 0x04, 0x04, 0x08, 0x02, 0x10, 0x06, 0x30, 0x01, 0x42, 0x9a, 0x02, 0x0a,
0x24, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2e, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x42, 0x14, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73,
0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x50, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f, 0x50, 0x01, 0x5a, 0x3a, 0x67,
0x69, 0x74, 0x68, 0x75, 0x62, 0x2e, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6d, 0x2f, 0x68, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2f, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f,
0x2d, 0x70, 0x75, 0x62, 0x6c, 0x69, 0x63, 0x2f, 0x70, 0x62, 0x73, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0xa2, 0x02, 0x03, 0x48, 0x43, 0x53, 0xaa,
0x02, 0x20, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x2e, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73,
0x75, 0x6c, 0x2e, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65,
0x72, 0x79, 0xca, 0x02, 0x20, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70, 0x5c, 0x43,
0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63,
0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0xe2, 0x02, 0x2c, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72,
0x70, 0x5c, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x5c, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x64,
0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x5c, 0x47, 0x50, 0x42, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x74, 0x61,
0x64, 0x61, 0x74, 0x61, 0xea, 0x02, 0x22, 0x48, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x69, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x72, 0x70,
0x3a, 0x3a, 0x43, 0x6f, 0x6e, 0x73, 0x75, 0x6c, 0x3a, 0x3a, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
0x64, 0x69, 0x73, 0x63, 0x6f, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72, 0x79, 0x62, 0x06, 0x70, 0x72, 0x6f, 0x74, 0x6f,
0x33,
}
var (
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescOnce sync.Once
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescData = file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDesc
)
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
func file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescGZIP() []byte {
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescOnce.Do(func() {
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescData = protoimpl.X.CompressGZIP(file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescData)
})
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
return file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDescData
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes = make([]protoimpl.MessageInfo, 3)
var file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_goTypes = []interface{}{
(*WatchServersRequest)(nil), // 0: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.WatchServersRequest
(*WatchServersResponse)(nil), // 1: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.WatchServersResponse
(*Server)(nil), // 2: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.Server
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
var file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_depIdxs = []int32{
2, // 0: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.WatchServersResponse.servers:type_name -> hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.Server
0, // 1: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.ServerDiscoveryService.WatchServers:input_type -> hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.WatchServersRequest
1, // 2: hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.ServerDiscoveryService.WatchServers:output_type -> hashicorp.consul.serverdiscovery.WatchServersResponse
2, // [2:3] is the sub-list for method output_type
1, // [1:2] is the sub-list for method input_type
1, // [1:1] is the sub-list for extension type_name
1, // [1:1] is the sub-list for extension extendee
0, // [0:1] is the sub-list for field type_name
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
func init() { file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_init() }
func file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_init() {
if File_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto != nil {
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[0].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*WatchServersRequest); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[1].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*WatchServersResponse); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes[2].Exporter = func(v interface{}, i int) interface{} {
switch v := v.(*Server); i {
case 0:
return &v.state
case 1:
return &v.sizeCache
case 2:
return &v.unknownFields
default:
return nil
}
}
}
type x struct{}
out := protoimpl.TypeBuilder{
File: protoimpl.DescBuilder{
GoPackagePath: reflect.TypeOf(x{}).PkgPath(),
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
RawDescriptor: file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDesc,
NumEnums: 0,
NumMessages: 3,
NumExtensions: 0,
NumServices: 1,
},
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
GoTypes: file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_goTypes,
DependencyIndexes: file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_depIdxs,
MessageInfos: file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_msgTypes,
}.Build()
Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness (#16302) Protobuf Refactoring for Multi-Module Cleanliness This commit includes the following: Moves all packages that were within proto/ to proto/private Rewrites imports to account for the packages being moved Adds in buf.work.yaml to enable buf workspaces Names the proto-public buf module so that we can override the Go package imports within proto/buf.yaml Bumps the buf version dependency to 1.14.0 (I was trying out the version to see if it would get around an issue - it didn't but it also doesn't break things and it seemed best to keep up with the toolchain changes) Why: In the future we will need to consume other protobuf dependencies such as the Google HTTP annotations for openapi generation or grpc-gateway usage. There were some recent changes to have our own ratelimiting annotations. The two combined were not working when I was trying to use them together (attempting to rebase another branch) Buf workspaces should be the solution to the problem Buf workspaces means that each module will have generated Go code that embeds proto file names relative to the proto dir and not the top level repo root. This resulted in proto file name conflicts in the Go global protobuf type registry. The solution to that was to add in a private/ directory into the path within the proto/ directory. That then required rewriting all the imports. Is this safe? AFAICT yes The gRPC wire protocol doesn't seem to care about the proto file names (although the Go grpc code does tack on the proto file name as Metadata in the ServiceDesc) Other than imports, there were no changes to any generated code as a result of this.
2 years ago
File_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto = out.File
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_rawDesc = nil
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_goTypes = nil
file_pbserverdiscovery_serverdiscovery_proto_depIdxs = nil
}