# strftime Fast strftime for Go [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/lestrrat-go/strftime.png?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/lestrrat-go/strftime) [![GoDoc](https://godoc.org/github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime?status.svg)](https://godoc.org/github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime) # SYNOPSIS ```go f := strftime.New(`.... pattern ...`) if err := f.Format(buf, time.Now()); err != nil { log.Println(err.Error()) } ``` # DESCRIPTION The goals for this library are * Optimized for the same pattern being called repeatedly * Be flexible about destination to write the results out * Be as complete as possible in terms of conversion specifications # API ## Format(string, time.Time) (string, error) Takes the pattern and the time, and formats it. This function is a utility function that recompiles the pattern every time the function is called. If you know beforehand that you will be formatting the same pattern multiple times, consider using `New` to create a `Strftime` object and reuse it. ## New(string) (\*Strftime, error) Takes the pattern and creates a new `Strftime` object. ## obj.Pattern() string Returns the pattern string used to create this `Strftime` object ## obj.Format(io.Writer, time.Time) error Formats the time according to the pre-compiled pattern, and writes the result to the specified `io.Writer` ## obj.FormatString(time.Time) string Formats the time according to the pre-compiled pattern, and returns the result string. # SUPPORTED CONVERSION SPECIFICATIONS | pattern | description | |:--------|:------------| | %A | national representation of the full weekday name | | %a | national representation of the abbreviated weekday | | %B | national representation of the full month name | | %b | national representation of the abbreviated month name | | %C | (year / 100) as decimal number; single digits are preceded by a zero | | %c | national representation of time and date | | %D | equivalent to %m/%d/%y | | %d | day of the month as a decimal number (01-31) | | %e | the day of the month as a decimal number (1-31); single digits are preceded by a blank | | %F | equivalent to %Y-%m-%d | | %H | the hour (24-hour clock) as a decimal number (00-23) | | %h | same as %b | | %I | the hour (12-hour clock) as a decimal number (01-12) | | %j | the day of the year as a decimal number (001-366) | | %k | the hour (24-hour clock) as a decimal number (0-23); single digits are preceded by a blank | | %l | the hour (12-hour clock) as a decimal number (1-12); single digits are preceded by a blank | | %M | the minute as a decimal number (00-59) | | %m | the month as a decimal number (01-12) | | %n | a newline | | %p | national representation of either "ante meridiem" (a.m.) or "post meridiem" (p.m.) as appropriate. | | %R | equivalent to %H:%M | | %r | equivalent to %I:%M:%S %p | | %S | the second as a decimal number (00-60) | | %T | equivalent to %H:%M:%S | | %t | a tab | | %U | the week number of the year (Sunday as the first day of the week) as a decimal number (00-53) | | %u | the weekday (Monday as the first day of the week) as a decimal number (1-7) | | %V | the week number of the year (Monday as the first day of the week) as a decimal number (01-53) | | %v | equivalent to %e-%b-%Y | | %W | the week number of the year (Monday as the first day of the week) as a decimal number (00-53) | | %w | the weekday (Sunday as the first day of the week) as a decimal number (0-6) | | %X | national representation of the time | | %x | national representation of the date | | %Y | the year with century as a decimal number | | %y | the year without century as a decimal number (00-99) | | %Z | the time zone name | | %z | the time zone offset from UTC | | %% | a '%' | # PERFORMANCE / OTHER LIBRARIES The following benchmarks were run separately because some libraries were using cgo on specific platforms (notabley, the fastly version) ``` // On my OS X 10.11.6, 2.9 GHz Intel Core i5, 16GB memory. // go version go1.8rc1 darwin/amd64 hummingbird% go test -tags bench -benchmem -bench . BenchmarkTebeka-4 300000 4469 ns/op 288 B/op 21 allocs/op BenchmarkJehiah-4 1000000 1931 ns/op 256 B/op 17 allocs/op BenchmarkFastly-4 2000000 724 ns/op 80 B/op 5 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrrat-4 1000000 1572 ns/op 240 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrratCachedString-4 3000000 548 ns/op 128 B/op 2 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrratCachedWriter-4 500000 2519 ns/op 192 B/op 3 allocs/op PASS ok github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime 22.900s ``` ``` // On a host on Google Cloud Platform, machine-type: n1-standard-4 (vCPU x 4, memory: 15GB) // Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux // go version go1.8rc1 linux/amd64 hummingbird% go test -tags bench -benchmem -bench . BenchmarkTebeka-4 500000 3904 ns/op 288 B/op 21 allocs/op BenchmarkJehiah-4 1000000 1665 ns/op 256 B/op 17 allocs/op BenchmarkFastly-4 1000000 2134 ns/op 192 B/op 13 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrrat-4 1000000 1327 ns/op 240 B/op 3 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrratCachedString-4 3000000 498 ns/op 128 B/op 2 allocs/op BenchmarkLestrratCachedWriter-4 1000000 3390 ns/op 192 B/op 3 allocs/op PASS ok github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime 44.854s ``` This library is much faster than other libraries *IF* you can reuse the format pattern. Here's the annotated list from the benchmark results. You can clearly see that (re)using a `Strftime` object and producing a string is the fastest. Writing to an `io.Writer` seems a bit sluggish, but since the one producing the string is doing almost exactly the same thing, we believe this is purely the overhead of writing to an `io.Writer` | Import Path | Score | Note | |:------------------------------------|--------:|:--------------------------------| | github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime | 3000000 | Using `FormatString()` (cached) | | github.com/fastly/go-utils/strftime | 2000000 | Pure go version on OS X | | github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime | 1000000 | Using `Format()` (NOT cached) | | github.com/jehiah/go-strftime | 1000000 | | | github.com/fastly/go-utils/strftime | 1000000 | cgo version on Linux | | github.com/lestrrat-go/strftime | 500000 | Using `Format()` (cached) | | github.com/tebeka/strftime | 300000 | | However, depending on your pattern, this speed may vary. If you find a particular pattern that seems sluggish, please send in patches or tests. Please also note that this benchmark only uses the subset of conversion specifications that are supported by *ALL* of the libraries compared. Somethings to consider when making performance comparisons in the future: * Can it write to io.Writer? * Which `%specification` does it handle?